Green Taxes: purposes, benefits and limitations

Impuestos Verdes: propósitos, beneficios y limitaciones

Published 2024-05-31

Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
Issue
No. 23 (2024): Negonotas Docentes
Section
Artículos
How to Cite
Jiménez Zapata, E. M., & Tovar Cardozo, G. (2024). Green Taxes: purposes, benefits and limitations. Negonotas Docentes, 23, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.52143/2346-1357.992
DOI

https://doi.org/10.52143/2346-1357.992
Dimensions
PlumX
Citations
Crossref
Citations in Crossref
Scopus Citations in Scopus
Google Scholar Google Sholar Citation
Europe PMC
Citations in Europe PMC

How to Cite

Jiménez Zapata, E. M., & Tovar Cardozo, G. (2024). Green Taxes: purposes, benefits and limitations. Negonotas Docentes, 23, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.52143/2346-1357.992

Download Citation

Elvia María Jiménez Zapata
Universidad Surcolombiana. Pitalito, Colombia
Sin roles de crédito asignados.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-0505
Ginna Tovar Cardozo
Universidad de la Amazonia. Florencia, Colombia
Sin roles de crédito asignados.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-5961
Show authors biography

This study addresses green taxes, highlighting their role as economic tools to encourage sustainable practices and mitigate climate change. It is shown that these taxes can increase environmental awareness and induce significant changes in consumption and production patterns, encouraging both consumers and companies to opt for more sustainable alternatives. In addition, the capacity of green taxes to generate additional income is highlighted, which can be used to finance sustainability and clean technology projects. However, key challenges are identified, such as the resilience of certain economic sectors, the risk of carbon leakage, and the impacts on consumer prices and international competitiveness. This analysis highlights the importance of careful design of green taxes to maximize their environmental and economic benefits while minimizing adverse effects. It is concluded that, although green taxes are valuable tools to promote sustainability, their success depends on a balance between environmental effectiveness, social justice, technological innovation and international cooperation.

Article visits 665 | PDF visits 1016

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Adedoyin, F., Alola, A., y Bekun, F. (2020). An assessment of environmental sustainability corridor: The role of economic expansion and research and development in EU countries. Science of the total environment, 713, 136726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136726
  2. Antón, A. (2020). Taxing crude oil: A financing alternative to mitigate climate change? Energy Policy,, 136, , 111031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111031
  3. Anwar, N., Mahmood, N., Yusliza, M., y Khalid, W. (2020). Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production. , 256, 120401. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401
  4. Bonoli, A., Zanni, S., y Serrano-Bernardo, F. . (2021). Sustainability in Building and Construction within the Framework of Circular Cities and European New Green Deal. The Contribution of Concrete Recycling. Sustainability, 3(4), 2139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13042139
  5. Cadoret, I., Galli, E., y Padovano, F. (2020). How do governments actually use environmental taxes? Applied Economics, 52, 5263 - 5281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1761536.
  6. Casasempere-Satorres, A., y Vercher-Ferrándiz, M. (2020). Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 4, 247-257. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
  7. Chaves-Cano, A., Sánchez-Castillo, V., Pérez-Gamboa, A., y Gonzalez-Argote, J. (2024). Internet of Things and Health: A literature review based on Mixed Method. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 10. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.4909
  8. Chen, Y., y Ma, Y. (2021). Does green investment improve energy firm performance? Energy Policy, 153, 112252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2021.112252
  9. Chien, F., Ananzeh, M., y Ngo, T. (2021). The effects of green growth, environmental-related tax, and eco-innovation towards carbon neutrality target in the US economy. Journal of environmental management, 299, 113633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113633
  10. Debortoli, D., y Brignole, N. (2024). Inteligencia empresarial para estimular el giro comercial en el microcentro de una ciudad de tamaño intermedio. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024195. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024195
  11. Ding, Q., Khattak, S., y Ahmad, M. (2020). Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustainable Production and Consumption. , 27, 254-268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
  12. Gómez, C. (2022). Ingreso, permanencia y estrategias para el fomento de los Semilleros de Investigación en una IES de Colombia. Región Científica, 1(1), 20226. https://rc.cienciasas.org/index.php/rc/article/view/6
  13. González, D., Garzón, D., y Sánchez, V. (2023). Cierre de las empresas del sector turismo en el municipio de Leticia: una caracterización de los factores implicados. Región Científica, 2(1), 202342. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202342
  14. González, R. (2023). La transversalidad del medioambiente: facetas y conceptos teóricos. Región Científica, 2(2), 202393. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202393
  15. Grover, C., y Bansal, S. (2021). Effect of green network and emission tax on consumer choice under discrete continuous framework. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23, 641 - 666. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-021-00312-y
  16. Guatemala, A., y Martínez-Prats, G. (2023). Capacidades tecnológicas en empresas sociales emergentes: una ruta de impacto social. Región Científica, 2(2), 2023111. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023111
  17. Guo, B., Wang, Y., Feng, Y.,... y Hu, F. (2022). The effects of environmental tax reform on urban air pollution: A quasi-natural experiment based on the Environmental Protection Tax Law. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.967524
  18. Guzmán, D., Gómez, C., y Sánchez, V. (2022). Construcción del Estado a partir de la participación Ciudadana. Revista Academia & Derecho, 14(25). https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/academia/article/view/10601
  19. Hao, L., Umar, M., Khan, Z., y Ali, W. (2020). Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? The Science of the total environment, 752, 141853. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
  20. Hemanand, D., Mishra, N., Premalatha, G., … y Sahile, K. . (2022). Applications of Intelligent Model to Analyze the Green Finance for Environmental Development in the Context of Artificial Intelligence. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2977824
  21. Jin, Y., Gao, X., y Wang, M. (2021). The financing efficiency of listed energy conservation and environmental protection firms: Evidence and implications for green finance in China. Energy Policy, 153, 112254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2021.112254
  22. Kammerer, M, y Murgas, B. (2024). La innovación tecnológica desde un enfoque de dinámica de sistemas. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024217. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024217
  23. Kang, S., y Lee, S. (2021). Impacts of Environmental Policies on Global Green Trade. Sustainability. , 13(3), 1517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13031517
  24. Karmaker, S., Hosan, S., Chapman, A., y Saha, B. (2021). The role of environmental taxes on technological innovation. . Energy, 232(121052). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2021.121052
  25. Khan, I., Zakari, A., Zhang, J., Dagar, V., y Singh, S. (2022). A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three-trilemma leadership. Energy, 248, 123619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123619
  26. Loayza, E. (2020). La investigación cualitativa en Ciencias Humanas y Educación. Criterios para elaborar artículos científicos. EDUCARE ET COMUNICARE Revista de investigación de la Facultad de Humanidades, 8(2), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.35383/educare.v8i2.536
  27. Machuca-Contreras, F., Canova-Barrios, C., y Castro, M. (2023). Una aproximación a los conceptos de innovación radical, incremental y disruptiva en las organizaciones. Región Científica, 2(1), 202324. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202324
  28. Mogrovejo Andrade, J. M. (2022). Estrategias resilientes y mecanismos de las organizaciones para mitigar los efectos ocasionados por la pandemia a nivel internacional. Región Científica, 1(1), 202211. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202211
  29. Moreira, A., y Reis, R. (2024). La inserción de los movimientos sociales en la protección del medio ambiente: cuerpos y aprendizajes en el Recôncavo da Bahia. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024208. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024208
  30. Mwita, K. (2022). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. Related Topics in Social Science, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920
  31. Ogunkunle, O., y Ahmed, N. (2021). Overview of Biodiesel Combustion in Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Engine Emissions on the Sustainable Human–Environment Scenario. Sustainability. 13(10). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13105465
  32. Panda, T., Kumar, A., Jakhar, S.,… y Nayak, S. (2020). Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243(118575). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575
  33. Pérez, N., y Arufe, A. (2023). Perspectivas de transición energética en América Latina en el escenario pospandémico. Región Científica, 2(1), 202334. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202334
  34. Prada, J. (2023). Modelo de Deterioro de los Instrumentos Financieros. Región Científica, 2(1), 202317-202317. https://rc.cienciasas.org/index.php/rc/article/view/17
  35. Rodríguez-Torres, E., Gómez-Cano, C., y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2024). Application of gamification in work environment. Gamification and Augmented Reality, 2(24). https://doi.org/10.56294/gr202424
  36. Rodríguez, E., Pérez, A., y Camejo, Y. (2023). Formación del liderazgo distribuido en los estudiantes de la carrera Gestión Sociocultural para el Desarrollo. Atenas, 61. https://pf.umcc.cu/index.php/atenas/article/view/778
  37. Rustam, A., Wang, Y., y Zameer, H. (2020). Environmental awareness, firm sustainability exposure and green consumption behaviors. Journal of Cleaner production, 268, 122016. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122016
  38. Sanabria, M. (2022). Construir nuevos espacios sostenibles respetando la diversidad cultural desde el nivel local. Región Científica, 1(2), 20222. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc20222
  39. Sánchez, Y., Pérez, A., Hernández, A., .. y Rodríguez, E. (2023). Hospital culture and social responsibility: a mixed study of the main lines for its development. Salud. Ciencia Y Tecnología-Serie De Conferencias, 2, 451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2023451
  40. Shabbir, M., Sulaiman, M., Al-Kumaim, N., Mahmood, A., y Abbas, M. (2020). Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Consumer Behavior towards the Environment. A Study from the UAE. Sustainability, 12(21), 8977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218977
  41. Shafique, M., Azam, A., Rafiq, M., y Luo, X. (2021). Evaluación del ciclo de vida de los vehículos eléctricos y los vehículos de motor de combustión interna: Estudio de caso de Hong Kong. Research in Transportation Economics. , 91, 101112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RETREC.2021.101112
  42. Shen, B., Zhu, C., Li, Q., y Wang, X. (2020). Green technology adoption in textiles and apparel supply chains with environmental taxes. International Journal of Production Research, 59, 4157-4174. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1758354
  43. Shen, Y., y Zhang, X. (2022). Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation. . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416749
  44. Siddaway, A., Wood, A., y Hedges, L. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
  45. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  46. Sohn, Y., Kim, H., Baritugo, K., … y Park, S. (2020). Recent Advances in Sustainable Plastic Upcycling and Biopolymers. Biotechnology journal, 19(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201900489.
  47. Song, M., Wang, S., y Zhang, H. (2020). Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation? Journal of Cleaner production, 258, 120849. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120849
  48. Taghizadeh‐Hesary, F., y Yoshino, N. (2020). Sustainable Solutions for Green Financing and Investment in Renewable Energy Projects. Energies, 13(4), 788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040788
  49. Tápanes, E., Bosch, O., Sánchez, Y., Marqués, M., y Santos, O. (2023). Sistema de indicadores para el control de la sostenibilidad de los centros históricos asociada al transporte. Región Científica, 2(1), 202352. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202352
  50. Töbelmann, D., y Wendler, T. (2020). The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Cleaner production, 244, 118787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118787
  51. Valencia-Celis, A. U., Patiño, G. R., y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2023). Environmental Knowledge Management Proposals in Education Systems. Bibliotecas. Anales de investigación, 19(2). https://doi.org/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9027955
  52. Vázquez, V., y Martínez, G. (2023). El desarrollo regional y su impacto en la sociedad mexicana. Región Científica, 2(1), 202336. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202336
  53. Wang, Y., y Yu, L. (2021). Can the current environmental tax rate promote green technology innovation? - Evidence from China’s resource-based industries. Journal of Cleaner production, 278, 123443. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123443
  54. Yamazaki, A. (2020). Environmental taxes and productivity: Lessons from Canadian manufacturing. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24545/00001727
  55. Yue, B., Sheng, G., She, S., y Xu, J. (2020). Impact of Consumer Environmental Responsibility on Green Consumption Behavior in China: The Role of Environmental Concern and Price Sensitivity. Sustainability, 12 (5), 2074. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052074.
  56. Zapata, F., Montoya, S., y Montoya-Zapata, D. (2024). Dilemas éticos planteados por el auge de la inteligencia artificial: una mirada desde el transhumanismo. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024225. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024225
Tutorials

Autors:

How send article?

Evaluator pair

Most read in the last 30 days

Information

Language

QR code

Keywords

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.9 - Metabiblioteca |