Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The role of qualitative research in transforming educational reality

El papel de la investigación cualitativa en transformación de la realidad educativa




Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Rodríguez Cairo, D. (2023). The role of qualitative research in transforming educational reality. Ignis, 17, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.52143/2711-029X.1059

Dimensions
PlumX
Citations

How to Cite

Rodríguez Cairo, D. (2023). The role of qualitative research in transforming educational reality. Ignis, 17, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.52143/2711-029X.1059

Download Citation

Dalía Rodríguez Cairo
Sin roles de crédito asignados.

Qualitative research is an essential tool for transforming the educational reality, offering a deep and nuanced understanding of educational contexts and experiences. This article examines three key trends in qualitative research in education: digital transformation, educational inclusion and equity, and critical and transformative pedagogies. The integration of digital technologies revolutionizes pedagogical practices, facilitates access to knowledge, and promotes new forms of interaction and collaboration. Qualitative research emphasizes the need to create more inclusive and equitable educational environments, adapting policies and practices to ensure quality education for all students, regardless of their socioeconomic or cultural background. Furthermore, critical pedagogies inspired by theories such as that of Paulo Freire seek to empower students to question and transform their social reality, promoting a fairer and more equitable education. This article highlights how qualitative research can be a powerful tool for driving significant and sustainable changes in education by providing a comprehensive vision and effective strategies to address contemporary challenges.


Article visits 90 | PDF visits 83


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Inclusion and equity in education: Making sense of global challenges. PROSPECTS, 49, 123 - 134. https://doi.
  2. org/10.1007/s11125-020-09506-w
  3. Araque-Barboza, F. , Beltrán De la Rosa, E., Mozo, A. , y Julio-Cajar, J. (2022). Enfermedades huerfanas, el estado colombiano y las
  4. instituciones privadas de salud. Revista Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.19
  5. Booker, K., y Campbell-Whatley, G. (2022). Student Perceptions of Inclusion at a Historically Black University. Journal of Negro
  6. Education, 88, 146 - 158. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.2.0146
  7. Borges-Machín, A., y González-Bravo, Y. (2022). Educación comunitaria para un envejecimiento activo: experiencia en construcción
  8. desde el autodesarrollo. Región Científica, 1(1), 202212. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202213
  9. Brennan, A., King, F. y Travers, J. (2019). Supporting the enactment of inclusive pedagogy in a primary school. International Journal of
  10. Inclusive Education, 25, 1540 - 1557. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1625452
  11. Cardeño-Portela, N., Cardeño-Portela, E. y Bonilla-Blanchar, E. (2023). Las TIC y la transformación académica en las universidades.
  12. Región Científica, 2(2), 202370. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202370
  13. Casasempere-Satorres, A. y Vercher-Ferrándiz, M. (2020). Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature
  14. review in qualitative research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 4, 247-257. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
  15. Chumaceiro-Hernández, A., Hernández, J., Velazco, J., Lagusev, Y. y Rogozhina, A. (2022). The Impact of Sustainable Development
  16. and Social Responsibility on Quality Education. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Volume XIII, Spring,
  17. (57): 51-62. https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt/article/view/6808
  18. Chumaceiro-Hernández, A., Hernández-García de Velázco, J. y Velazco-Hernández, J. (2023). Políticas públicas para la gestión de
  19. la felicidad organizacional. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 29(4), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i4.41240 https://
  20. www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rcs/article/view/41240
  21. Cilesiz, S. y Greckhamer, T. (2020). Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Education Research: Its Current Status and Future Potential.
  22. Review of Research in Education, 44, 332 - 369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907347
  23. Durak, H. (2021). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate teaching technologies into their classrooms: Examining the effects of
  24. teaching environments based on open-ended, hands-on and authentic tasks. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 5365
  25. - 5387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10511-5
  26. Eslava-Zapata, R., Gómez-Cano, C., Chacón-Guerrero, E. y Esteban-Montilla, R. (2023). Análisis Bibliométrico sobre estilos de
  27. liderazgo: contribuciones y tendencia de la investigación. Educación y Sociedad, 15(6), 574-587. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.
  28. php/rus/article/view/4175
  29. Eslava-Zapata, R., Mogollón Calderón, O. y Chacón Guerrero, E. (2023). Socialización organizacional en las universidades: estudio
  30. empírico. Región Científica, 2(2), 202369. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202369
  31. Filho, W., Raath, S., Lazzarini, B., Vargas, V., Souza, L., Anholon, R., Quelhas, O., Haddad, R., Kļaviņš, M. y Orlovic, V. (2018). The
  32. role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
  33. JCLEPRO.2018.07.017
  34. Fisher, C. (2023). Decoding the Ethics Code: A Practical Guide for Psychologists (SAGE, Ed. 5 ed.).
  35. Gómez-Cano, C. y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2021). Evaluación del nivel de madurez en la gestión de proyectos de una empresa prestadora
  36. de servicios públicos. Económicas CUC, 42(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.42.2.2021.Org.7
  37. Gómez-Cano, C. y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2023). Systematic review on Augmented Reality in health education. Gamification and Augmented
  38. Reality, 1, 28. https://doi.org/10.56294/gr202328
  39. Gómez-Cano, C., Sánchez-Castillo, V., Castillo-Gonzalez, W., Vitón-Castillo, A. y González-Argote, J. (2023). Internet of Things
  40. and Wearable Devices: A Mixed Literature Review. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 9(4), e3. https://doi.
  41. org/10.4108/eetiot.v9i4.4276
  42. Gómez-Miranda, O. (2022). La franquicia: de la inversión al emprendimiento. Región Científica, 1(1), 20229. https://doi.org/10.58763/
  43. rc20229
  44. Gonzales-Tito, Y. , Quintanilla-López, L. y Pérez-Gamboa, A. (2023). Metaverse and education: a complex space for the next educational
  45. revolution. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 2, 56. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202356
  46. González-García, J., Lozano-Pineda, C., Cuartas-Díaz, M. y Torres-Barreto, M. (2023). Ejercicio basado en el juego y centrado en la
  47. inteligencia emocional. Región Científica, 2(1), 202365. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202365
  48. Harper, B. (2018). Technology and Teacher–Student Interactions: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Research on Technology in
  49. Education, 50, 214 - 225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
  50. Hernández-García de Velazco J., Velazco-Hernández J. y Blanco-Valiente S. (2022). El Feminismo y la participación de las mujeres en
  51. la política en Colombia. Una Retrospectiva del Siglo XX (1949-1991). Feminism and participation of women in the politics
  52. in Colombia. A Retrospective of the Twentieth Century (1949-1991). Revista Izquierdas. No. 51. pp. 1-28. http://www.
  53. izquierdas.cl/images/pdf/2022/51/art67.pdf
  54. Hernández-García de Velazco, J. (2022). Sociedades del conocimiento y ciencia abierta en la nueva normalidad. JURÍDICAS CUC, 18(1),
  55. –4. de https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/4475
  56. Jackson, T., y Allen-Handy, A. (2018). Centering the significance of qualitative studies on the sociocultural and sociopolitical contexts
  57. of education to inform policy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31, 645 - 651. https://doi.org/10.1080
  58. /09518398.2018.1488010
  59. Jacobson, M., Levin, J., y Kapur, M. (2019). Education as a Complex System: Conceptual and Methodological Implications. Educational
  60. Researcher, 48, 112 - 119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19826958
  61. Kerrigan, M., y Johnson, A. (2018). Qualitative Approaches to Policy Research in Education: Contesting the Evidence-Based, Neoliberal
  62. Regime. American Behavioral Scientist, 63, 287 - 295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218819693
  63. Kerrigan, M., y Johnson, A. (2018). Qualitative Approaches to Policy Research in Education: Contesting the Evidence-Based, Neoliberal
  64. Regime. American Behavioral Scientist, 63, 287 - 295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218819693
  65. Kim, H. (2020). Multimodal input during technology-assisted teacher instruction and English learner’s learning experience. Innovation
  66. in Language Learning and Teaching, 15, 293 - 305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1800708
  67. Kim, J., Florian, L., y Pantić, N. (2020). The development of inclusive practice under a policy of integration. International Journal of
  68. Inclusive Education, 26, 1068 - 1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1773946
  69. Ledesma, F., y Malave-González, B. (2022). Patrones de comunicación científica sobre E-commerce: un estudio bibliométrico en la base
  70. de datos Scopus. Región Científica, 1(1), 202214. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202214
  71. López-Gónzalez, Y. (2023). Competencia digital del profesorado para las habilidades TIC en el siglo XXI: una evaluación de su
  72. desarrollo. Región Científica, 2(2), 2023119. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023119
  73. Meyer, D., y Schutz, P. (2020). Why talk about qualitative and mixed methods in educational psychology? Introduction to special issue.
  74. Educational Psychologist, 55, 193 - 196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1796671
  75. Mogrovejo-Andrade, J. (2022). Estrategias resilientes y mecanismos de las organizaciones para mitigar los efectos ocasionados por la
  76. pandemia a nivel internacional. Región Científica, 1(1), 202211. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202211
  77. Monzón-Pinglo, L. , Davila-Cisneros, J., Rodríguez-Torres, E., y Pérez-Gamboa, A. J. (2023). La resiliencia en el contexto universitario,
  78. un estudio mixto exploratorio. Pensamiento Americano, 16(31), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.16.31.636
  79. Mwita, K. (2022). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. Related Topics in Social Science, 11(6).
  80. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920
  81. Newman, M., y Gough, D. (2019). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In
  82. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1
  83. Noroña, Y., Colala Troya, A. L., y Peñate, J. (2023). La orientación para la proyección individual y social en la educación de jóvenes
  84. y adultos: un estudio mixto sobre los proyectos de vida. Región Científica, 2(2), 202389. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202389
  85. Pérez-Gamboa, A., García-Acevedo, Y. y García-Batán, J. (2019). Proyecto de vida y proceso formativo universitario: un estudio
  86. exploratorio en la Universidad de Camagüey. Trasnsformación, 15(3), 280-296. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_
  87. arttext&pid=S2077-29552019000300280
  88. Pérez-Gamboa, A., Gómez-Cano, C., y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2022). Decision making in university contexts based on knowledge
  89. management systems. Data & Metadata, 2, 92. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202292
  90. Pérez-Gamboa, A., Rodríguez-Torres, E., y Camejo-Pérez, Y. (2023). Fundamentos de la atención psicopedagógica para la configuración
  91. del proyecto de vida en estudiantes universitarios. Educación y Sociedad, 21(2), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7979972
  92. Piana, R., y Arévalo, M. (2023). Los obiter dictum como discursos del poder. Estudio a partir del caso Fernández de Kirchner. Revista
  93. Jurídicas CUC, 19(1), 609–634. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.19.1.2023.21
  94. Pomeroy, D. (2020). Educational equity policy as human taxonomy: who do we compare and why does it matter?. Critical Studies in
  95. Education, 61, 329 - 344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1440615
  96. Ricardo-Jiménez, L. (2022). Dimensiones de emprendimiento: Relación educativa. El caso del programa cumbre. Región Científica, 1(1),
  97. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202210
  98. Ripoll-Rivaldo, M. (2023). El emprendimiento social universitario como estrategia de desarrollo en personas, comunidades y territorios.
  99. Región Científica, 2(2), 202379. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202379
  100. Shaeffer, S. (2019). Inclusive education: a prerequisite for equity and social justice. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 181 - 192. https://
  101. doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09598-w
  102. Smith, C. y Baik, C. (2019). High-impact teaching practices in higher education: a best evidence review. Studies in Higher Education, 46,
  103. - 1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1698539
  104. Smits, T. y Janssenswillen, P. (2020). Multicultural teacher education: a cross-case exploration of pre-service language teachers’
  105. approach to ethnic diversity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33, 421 - 445. https://doi.org/10.1080/
  106. 2019.1681536
  107. Valencia-Celis, A. U., Patiño, G. y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2023). Environmental Knowledge Management Proposals in Education Systems.
  108. Bibliotecas. Anales de investigación, 19(2). https://doi.org/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9027955
  109. Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M. y Kollar, I. (2020). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of
  110. different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54, 1 - 17.
  111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455
  112. Wynter-Hoyte, K., Braden, E., Rodriguez, S. y Thornton, N. (2019). Disrupting the status quo: exploring culturally relevant and
  113. sustaining pedagogies for young diverse learners. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22, 428 - 447. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361
  114. 2017.1382465
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.9 - Metabiblioteca |