Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Pedagogy and Future: A Look at Lifelong Education

Pedagogía y futuro: una mirada a la educación para toda la vida




Section
Artículos

How to Cite
Ramírez Echavarría, Y. (2024). Pedagogy and Future: A Look at Lifelong Education. Ignis, 18, 33-53. https://doi.org/10.52143/2711-029X.1031

Dimensions
PlumX
Citations

How to Cite

Ramírez Echavarría, Y. (2024). Pedagogy and Future: A Look at Lifelong Education. Ignis, 18, 33-53. https://doi.org/10.52143/2711-029X.1031

Download Citation

Yisel Ramírez Echavarría
Sin roles de crédito asignados.

In the context of a world undergoing constant technological and laboral evolution, lifelong education emerges as an essential solution to maintain individuals’ relevance and competitiveness. This article examines current trends in continuous education, highlighting three key areas. Firstly, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education is transforming personalized learning and improving student assessment efficiency. Secondly, modular learning models and micro-credentials are gaining
prominence, offering flexibility and relevance in acquiring specific skills. Finally, hybrid educational models and experiential education are emerging as effective methodologies for developing practical competencies and soft skills. These approaches
not only facilitate deep and meaningful learning but also prepare students to face real-world challenges more effectively. Pedagogy must adapt to these changes, promoting curiosity, innovation, and resilience to ensure that education remains a powerful tool throughout one’s life.


Article visits 211 | PDF visits 196


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Afanador, N. (2023). Historia de la producción y sus retos en la era actual. Región Científica, 2(1), 202315. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202315
  2. Ahmad, S., Alam, M., Rahmat, M., Mubarik, M., y Hyder, S. (2022). Academic and Administrative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031101
  3. Araque, F., Beltrán, E., Mozo, A., y Julio, J. (2022). Enfermedades huérfanas, el estado colombiano y las instituciones privadas de salud. Revista Jurídicas CUC, 18(1), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.18.1.2022.19
  4. Borges, A., y González, Y. (2022). Educación comunitaria para un envejecimiento activo: experiencia en construcción desde el autodesarrollo. Región Científica, 1(1), 202212. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202213
  5. Car, L., Kyaw, B., Teo, A., Fox, T., Vimalesvaran, S., Apfelbacher, C., Kemp, S., y Chavannes, N. (2022). Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review. JMIR Serious Games, 10. https://doi.org/10.2196/29594
  6. Cardeño-Portela, N., Cardeño-Portela, E. J., y Bonilla-Blanchar, E. (2023). Las TIC y la transformación académica en las universidades. Región Científica, 2(2), 202370. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202370
  7. Casasempere-Satorres, A., y Vercher-Ferrándiz, M. (2020). Bibliographic documentary analysis. Getting the most out of the literature review in qualitative research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 4, 247-257. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.247-257
  8. Chen, L., Chen, P., y Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  9. Chumaceiro, A., Hernández, J., Velazco, J., Lagusev, Y., y Rogozhina, A. (2022A). The Impact of
  10. Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility on Quality Education. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.1(57).05
  11. Chumaceiro, A., Hernández, J., y Velazco, J. (2022B). Políticas públicas para la gestión de la felicidad organizacional. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 29(4), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i4.41240
  12. Coates, H., Xie, Z., y Hong, X. (2020). Engaging transformed fundamentals to design global hybrid higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 166 - 176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859683
  13. Collins-Nelsen, R., Koziarz, F., Levinson, B., Allard, E., Verkoeyen, S., y Raha, S. (2021). Social context and transferable skill development in experiential learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59, 421 - 430. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1886970
  14. Cox, A. (2021). Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-020-00237-8
  15. Díaz-Guerra, D. (2022). Educación para el cambio. Estrategias y políticas públicas para una Latinoamérica en transformación. Opinión Pública, 18. https://doi.org/10.52143/2346-1357.1001
  16. Díaz-Guerra, D., Pérez-Gamboa, A., y Gómez-Cano, C. (2023). Social network analysis in virtual
  17. educational environments: Implications for collaborative learning and academic community
  18. development. AWARI, 4. https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.595
  19. Eslava-Zapata, R., Mogollón, O., y Chacón, E. (2023). Socialización organizacional en las universidades: estudio empírico. Región Científica, 2(2), 202369. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202369
  20. Gagne, J., Koppel, P., Park, H., Cadavero, A., Cho, E., Rushton, S., Yamane, S., Manturuk, K., y Jung, D. (2021). Pedagogy That Makes a Difference: A Netnographic Analysis (Preprint). JMIR Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.27736
  21. Gómez-Cano, C., Sánchez-Castillo, V., y Santana-González, Y. (2023). Factores que inciden en la
  22. procrastinación académica de los estudiantes de educación superior en Colombia. Universidad y Sociedad, 15(4), 421-431. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/3995
  23. Gonzales-Tito, Y. M., Quintanilla-López, L., y Pérez-Gamboa, A. J. (2023). Metaverse and education: a complex space for the next educational revolution. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, 2, 56. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202356
  24. González-García, J., Lozano-Pineda, C., Cuartas-Díaz, M., y Torres-Barreto, M. (2023). Ejercicio
  25. basado en el juego y centrado en la inteligencia emocional. Región Científica, 2(1), 202365. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202365
  26. González-Pérez, L., y Ramírez-Montoya, M. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
  27. Heinrich, W., y Green, P. (2020). Remixing Approaches to Experiential Learning, Design, and
  28. Assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 43, 205 - 223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920915608
  29. Hernández, J. (2022). Sociedades del conocimiento y ciencia abierta en la nueva normalidad. JURÍDICAS CUC, 18(1), 1–4. Recuperado a partir de https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/4475
  30. Hernández, J., Velazco, J., y Blanco, S. (2022). El Feminismo y la participación de las mujeres en la política en Colombia. Una Retrospectiva del Siglo XX (1949-1991). Revista Izquierdas. No. 51. pp. 1-28. https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/handle/11323/10236
  31. Hernández-Lugo, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence as a tool for analysis in Social Sciences: methods and applications. LatIA, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.62486/latia202411
  32. Herodotou, C., Sharples, M., Gaved, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Rienties, B., Scanlon, E., y Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovative Pedagogies of the Future: An Evidence-Based Selection. Frontiers in Education, 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00113
  33. Hunt, T., Carter, R., Yang, S., Zhang, L., y Williams, M. (2020). Navigating the Use of Microcredentials. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37, 3 - 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420933568
  34. Ifenthaler, D., y Schumacher, C. (2023). Reciprocal issues of artificial and human intelligence in
  35. education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55, 1 - 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2154511
  36. Jagušt, T., y Botički, I. (2019). Mobile learning system for enabling collaborative and adaptive pedagogies with modular digital learning contents. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40692-019-00139-3
  37. Kammerer-David, M. , y Murgas-Téllez, B. (2024). La innovación tecnológica desde un enfoque de dinámica de sistemas. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024217. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024217
  38. Ledesma, F., y Malave-González, B. E. (2022). Patrones de comunicación científica sobre E-commerce: un estudio bibliométrico en la base de datos Scopus. Región Científica, 1(1), 202214. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202214
  39. Li, X., Haupt, J., y Lee, J. (2021). Student mobility choices in transnational education: impact of macro-,meso- and micro-level factors. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43, 639 - 653. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1905496
  40. Liu, Y., Chen, L., y Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers’ teaching and students’ learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929175
  41. López, M. M., Inguanzo, A. M., y Guerra, E. (2024). La Orientación Educativa. Desafíos teóricos y
  42. prácticos. Región Científica, 3(1), 2024245. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024245
  43. López-Gónzalez, Y. (2023). Competencia digital del profesorado para las habilidades TIC en el siglo XXI: una evaluación de su desarrollo. Región Científica, 2(2), 2023119. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023119
  44. Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., y Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized Education in the Artificial Intelligence Era: What to Expect Next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2021.3055032
  45. Monzón-Pinglo, L., Davila-Cisneros, J., Rodríguez-Torres, E., y Pérez-Gamboa, A. (2023). La resiliencia en el contexto universitario, un estudio mixto exploratorio. Pensamiento Americano, 16(31), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21803/penamer.16.31.636
  46. Mwita, K. (2022). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. Related Topics in Social Science, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920
  47. Noroña, Y., Colala, A., y Peñate, J. (2023). La orientación para la proyección individual y social en la educación de jóvenes y adultos: un estudio mixto sobre los proyectos de vida. Región Científica, 2(2), 202389. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202389
  48. Ødegaard, E. (2021). Reimagining “Collaborative Exploration”—A Signature Pedagogy for Sustainability in Early Childhood Education and Care. Sustainability, 13, 5139. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13095139
  49. Peña-Ayala, A. (2021). A learning design cooperative framework to instill 21st century education.Telematics and Informatics, 62, 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2021.101632
  50. Pérez, A., García, Y., y García, J. (2019). Proyecto de vida y proceso formativo universitario: un estudio exploratorio en la Universidad de Camagüey. Trasnsformación, 15(3), 280-296. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2077-29552019000300280
  51. Pérez, A., Gómez-Cano, C., y Sánchez-Castillo, V. (2022). Decision making in university contexts based on knowledge management systems. Data & Metadata, 2, 92. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202292
  52. Pérez, A., y Díaz-Guerra, D. (2023). Artificial Intelligence for the development of qualitative studies. LatIA, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.62486/latia20234
  53. Piana, R., y Arévalo, M. (2023). Los obiter dictum como discursos del poder. Estudio a partir del
  54. caso Fernández de Kirchner. Revista Jurídicas CUC, 19(1), 609–634. https://doi.org/10.17981/
  55. juridcuc.19.1.2023.21
  56. Pirkkalainen, H., Sood, I., Napoles, C., Kukkonen, A., y Camilleri, A. (2022). How might microcredentials
  57. influence institutions and empower learners in higher education? Educational Research, 65,
  58. - 63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2157302
  59. Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., y Depaepe, F. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23, 269 - 290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
  60. Rodríguez-Torres, E., Davila-Cisneros, J., y Gómez-Cano, C. (2024). La formación para la configuración de proyectos de vida: una experiencia mediante situaciones de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Varona, 79(e2391). http://revistas.ucpejv.edu.cu/index.php/rVar/article/view/2391
  61. Roman-Acosta, D., Rodríguez-Torres, E., Baquedano-Montoya, M. B., López-Zavala, L., y Pérez-
  62. Gamboa, A. J. (2024). ChatGPT y su uso para perfeccionar la escritura académica en educandos
  63. de posgrado. Praxis Pedagógica, 24(36), 53-75. https://revistas.uniminuto.edu/index.php/praxis/article/view/3536
  64. Roy, A., Newman, A., Ellenberger, T., y Pyman, A. (2019). Outcomes of international student mobility programs: a systematic review and agenda for future research. Studies in Higher Education, 44, 1630 - 1644. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1458222
  65. Ruddy, C., y Ponte, F. (2019). Preparing students for university studies and beyond: a micro-credential trial that delivers academic integrity awareness. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68, 56 - 67. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1562520
  66. Santos, J., Figueiredo, A., y Vieira, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse education today, 72, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
  67. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., y Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
  68. Sucharew, H., y Macaluso, M. (2019). Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach. Journal of hospital medicine, 14, E1-E3. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3248
  69. Taquette, S., y Souza, L. (2022). Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: A Critical Literature Review.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221078731
  70. Wheelahan, L., y Moodie, G. (2021). Analysing micro-credentials in higher education: a Bernsteinian analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53, 212 - 228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1887358
  71. Wu, Q., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Chen, Y., Long, H., y Wang, J. (2022). Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.855403
  72. Zafari, M., Bazargani, J., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., y Choi, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Applications
  73. in K-12 Education: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, PP, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/
  74. ACCESS.2022.3179356
  75. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V., Bond, M., y Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.9 - Metabiblioteca |